INTRODUCTION. 

I am sure like me you have watched the events surrounding the tragedy of Shamima Begum unfold with a growing sense of despair.

It is tragic what has happened to Ms Begum. Having parents who believed in Jihad, what chance did the girl stand? Being groomed whilst 14, flying out to become a Jihadi Bride at 15, raped and turned into a brainwashed religious breeding machine.

Life at first seemed golden, living the Islamic dream of Isis. Like a heroin addict assumes the happiness would never end.

But the dreams soon began to turn dark and become nightmares. The artillery exchanges getting closer, men dying, fathers not coming home. The screams of imams becoming more zealous, more desperate. Shemima lost one child, then another. Undeterred her husband continued to satisfy his lusts, killing during the day, impregnating at night, with occasional breaks for prayer.

Another pregnancy, except this time the enemy were closer.  Bullets ricocheted off walls, cries of death outside the door, the nightmare was here, and Shemima was on her own.

Allah had discarded his pawns, he was bored with them.

She had another child and named him Jarrah, after a Muslim warlord who slaughtered Jews and had slaves.

She was proud of this.

She begged to be allowed to come back to England, waving her child like a banner, “I have a child and I know how to use him! “ she seemed to be shouting.

But there were darker, more insidious forces at work.

Hearing her pleas to be allowed back to England, her fellow Isis brides turned on her. Like rats eating their own so they turned on her, threatening to kill her and little Jarrah.

The peaceful religion was now turning its desire for peace on her. They wanted her dead.

Fleeing for her life, chased by those she once called sisters, she ran in terror for the Refugee camp.

Do I feel pity for her? Yes, I guess I do. Should she come back to England?

No.

She chose her path, her family still support Isis, she still supports Isis. She justifies the killing of children, she thinks there is nothing wrong with beheading, Isis forcing mothers to eat their dead children.

This only becomes wrong when it happens to her.

“Nothing shall ever happen to us except what Allah has ordained for us. He is our Mawla (protector).” And in Allah let the believers put their trust.)

Quran (Surah Tawba, Verse 51)

“No calamity occurs on earth nor in yourselves but it is inscribed in the Book of Decrees before We bring it into existence. Verily, that is easy for Allah.

In order that you may not grieve at the things over that you fail to get, nor rejoice over that which has been given to you. And Allah likes not prideful boasters.

Quran (Surah Hadid, Verses 22,23)

Shamima Begum, according to her own beliefs is meant to go through this. She was, according to Islam, destined to lose 3 children and face this horror.

So why her sadness, why the fake piety of the left?

If they claim to respect Islam and its traditions then why do they go against it?

Her father too should embrace the beliefs he espouses.

To do otherwise is Blasphemy according to Islam.

ET TRAGOEDIA EST POTESTAS.

(In tragedy there is opportunity)

If anyone can spot opportunity in tragedy then it is Diane Abbot.

A marriage break up is quite tragic in anybody books, but yet Abbot was able to spot an opportunity here and was soon using it to have sex with Jeremy Corbyn. Rumour has it that Corbyn began his affair with Abbott whilst married.

There is the tragedy of child abuse, and once more Diane Abbott spotted an opportunity, but not in the way you would think.

In the 1970s and ’80s PIE were at the height of their power, they had been accepted by the National Council of Civil of Liberties, who had voted for them to be affiliated with them.

PIE (Paedophile Information Exchange) were given a contract by Labour that they should get £35,000 for 3 years then another in three years time. £70,000 was given to PIE. One of those who voted that PIE be given affiliate status?

Yep, Diane Abbott.

Diane had seen PIE as a legitimate group and had voted for them to be a group deserving protection.

The Tragedy of Child rape and abuse was seen by Diane as an opportunity to get votes for Labour. Except, she saw the voters being child abusers. But hey, if allowing a child to be abused got you a vote, then they are free to abuse.

Another tragedy that Diane saw opportunity in was underprivileged children.

Unfortunately, the Diane Abbott Foundation was the opportunity to exploit this area. Another tragedy is racism, and here too Diane spotted an opportunity to make a name for herself and win votes.

Her purely racist organisation that was only for black children in London schools is as race-based as it can get, yet it was allowed.

Out of the tragedy of racism and underprivileged Diane’s foundation raised money to help these children.

Or did she? To honour herself, she held an event at Parliament that cost her charity 80% of its annual budget.

Money that was meant to help underprivileged children that was raised through outright racism was lavishly wasted on a party in parliament.

CLADI CONPONERE POTESTATE MEA IN SOMNIS SCALAM. 

(Your Tragedy is my ladder to power)

There is nothing more rabid than Diane Abbott on the trail of a tragedy in order to win votes.

Whilst the media hail Diane Abbot as a figure like Joan of Arc in today’s modern politics they ignore her blatant hypocrisy and defending of that which is wrong.

The Socialist who spends money raised by charity on a party in parliament in her own name. Robbing from underprivileged children.

The woman, in order to get votes, is part of the NCCL who attempt to make Paedophilia acceptable. Diane Abbott who this year tried to defend paedophiles by inserting an amendment into a law that was designed to protect children, that in effect would defend the child abuser.

The law enabled the police the right to demand that America data giant’s hand over information within 3 days as part of criminal investigations and ensuring a conviction within days, not years as it is now.

EGO ACCUSATIS EX VOTO MEO OCCIDENDUM ME ADDUCERE! 

(I accuse you of murder bring me my votes).

Recently Diane Abbott jumped on the bandwagon that was the hearse at the head of the funeral for Jarra, Shemima Begum’s son.

She accused Sajid Javid of having blood on his hands after he stripped Ms Begum of her citizenship.

I would like to ask how this in any way shape or form killed Jarra?

Even if Mr Javid had said she could come back, it would have taken another month for her to return home. The baby was announced dead within days of the decision. The child already had pneumonia, so his decision did not cause the child’s death.

In her blind rage, Abbott ignores the facts like she does whenever there is a tragedy. She ignores all that Shamima Begum said. She ignores the death threats from isis brides. that made her flee for her life. She ignores the fact that Shamima Begum had lost two other children before Jarrah, and this was before she lost her citizenship.

If Diane Abbott cared about children why does she ignore the 30,000 child rapes in England last year, why make changes in laws in order to protect those child rapists?

If we look at the facts that the child would not have been saved (as stated the child died within days of the decision being announced) then we have to acknowledge that the law of Allah applies:

“Nothing shall ever happen to us except what Allah has ordained for us. He is our Mawla (protector).” And in Allah let the believers put their trust.)

Quran (Surah Tawba, Verse 51)

However, like a bull in a China shop, Diane clumsily stumbles around, disrespecting Islam and its wisdom, how colonial of Ms Abbot to say it was not the will of Islam, it was the will of Sajid Javid and that she, devourer of cheesecakes is wise enough to know better than Islam.

In one fell swoop has said Islam is lying and our home Secretary is more powerful than Allah.

Is this a stoning offence……?

For any lefty chums reading this:

I COULD BEAT DIANE ABBOT AT THE 100 AND 400 METERS RACES.

There. The DFLA has finally been “Racest”