“Those who fail to take an interest in public affairs are destined to be ruled by evil people.”

Plato.

In 2016 Sadiq Khan gave a rather dark yet subtle speech in his election campaign. He said, “I accept that the comments that Ken Livingstone has made make it more difficult for Londoners of Jewish faith to feel that the Labour Party is a place for them, and I will carry on doing what I have always been doing, which is to speak for everyone.” Mr Khan also said, “This is a neck-and-neck race. It is all about turnout.”

At first glance it seems quite innocuous, however, look at it again.

Why single out Jews as the only community who may feel alienated? Surely the traditional working class of this country no longer feel that Labour are a place for them?

No, Khan wanted to single out Jews, he wanted to put that in the mix. He had nothing positive to say. He enforced their belief that it was going to get a lot more uncomfortable for them.

If we look at it mathematically we can see there are probably 100,000 practising Jews in the capital, however, there are more Muslims. Khan’s subtle speech was like a bell to Pavlov’s dog. “Jews feel uncomfortable in the Labour party” The Muslim voter’s ears are pricked. They start listening. Given that the percentage of the London population is 12% Muslim, that is a huge chunk of votes.

WHICH IDIOT THOUGHT OF KHAN BEING A GOOD MAYOR? 

Khan was nominated by Jeremy Corbyn, Corbyn, who has ties to Hamas and Hezbollah, Corbyn who slanders Israel on Iranian TV. Corbyn who despite being told by Rita Chakrabarti in her report that “Zionist” is an insulting euphemism for Jew (read page 12) downplays anti-semitism in the Labour Party. Corbyn who donates money to holocaust deniers, Corbyn who allows convicted terrorists to speak at events he has invited them to.

The List is endless, how the warnings were not headed is beyond me.

AH, BUT I HAVE A RACE CARD! 

If Khan could be as good a mayor as he was at playing the race card he would have London as the world’s leading capital. He once said in a speech, “The fact is that if you are black or Asian in Britain today:

You are significantly more likely to be unemployed. You will earn less

And you will live a shorter life than your white neighbours” (Given the fact that due to khan’s incompetence we have our black youth stabbing each other to death more than ever his speech is ominous) What Khan did not say however is that Hindus, Sikhs and the Chinese are a roaring and welcome success in England. (Maybe because they do not sit on their arses playing the race card game all day). If England was as racist as the left claim all would suffer, not just one or two races. So why did Khan insist “Asian” when this clearly was not the case? (oh that’s right, Asian in Labour Circles is a euphemism for Muslim) He later claimed, “it was an injustice that causes untold economic and social damage to our country”

So why are many refugees still trying to get to England, I thought they were running from injustice, not toward it? Another baffling speech that came from Khan was that if you were middle-aged and white you had no place in today’s political arena. Snidingly and arrogant he said to a colleague “I don’t think she has got the answers for the 2020s, the future business, we’re a modern city, we’re young, we’re diverse.” (he was referring to Tessa Jowell)

So if you are white (not diverse) if you are not young you do not have a place in modern politics!

RACIST DFLA SPOUTING FASCIST NONSENSE! I FEEL SO TRIGGERED I AM GOING TO HAVE A DOUBLE SOYA! 

Now before you go along with Stay buried or stink Berry or Stuchbery there, stay with me. This will all become clear.

The Financial Times started me out on this and as they were happily sneering at certain voters, ie: those who did not vote for Khan, I thought I would look at Khan’s voters.

Well, how do you think it turned out?

There were huge block votes from the Muslim community, along with large electoral fraud in those areas. There was a huge block vote from the unions. (Corbyn) Lastly, and this is where it gets interesting, there was a large number of votes from young single people or couples who were young and had no children.

So Khan was not elected on his policies, but his religion, orders from Labour and those who wanted to feel that they were young and diverse.

Khan had no policies, no idea of running a capital city.

How has this panned out for London?

WHAT YOU SOW, SO SHALL YE REAP! 

Sadiq Khan becomes mayor of London in 2016. It here we see the sudden and massive jump in crime:

Crime figures for London. These are violent crimes.

2017/18    250,287

2016/17    237,774

2015/16    226,650— Khan becomes Mayor May 2016.

2014/15    197,472—-Boris Johnson leaves Mayoral office.

2013/14    154,113

2012/13    150,168

2011/12    153,938

2010/11    165,923

Crime figures rocket when Khan takes over, facts cannot lie.

The number of rapes reported to police in London has risen by almost 20% since last year. The Met explained that this increase cannot be put down to people having more confidence in reporting rape to the police. There were 7,613 reported rapes in the year to January, compared to 6,392 over the past 12 months. Data from the Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime (MOPAC).

KHAN THE CRIME SUPPORTER.

Steady the Khan supporters. If you do not tackle crime, you support crime.

You cannot claim to be against crime yet do nothing to oppose it.

You cannot claim to be against crime, yet withdraw funds from the agencies that fight crime.

You cannot claim to be against crime and take every opportunity to fly abroad and stay silent.

I WOULD LOVE TO FIGHT CRIME BUT DON’T HAVE THE MONEY, TORIES WON’T GIVE ME ANY! 

Let’s look at the bollocks Khan talks (stay untriggered, bollocks is not an obscene word see famous Sex Pistols case 1977.)

Khan has had the money, Khan has had plenty of money:

Mayor Sadiq Khan slammed for spending £2.3million as he turned London’s New Year fireworks show into an EU tribute.

Sadiq Khan to spend £770m on London cycling initiatives.

Fury as Sadiq Khan spends £4.5m launching ‘culture festival’ in London borough where a boy, 14, was brutally murdered.

Critics slam Sadiq Khan for ‘squandering’ £7.1million per year from police budget on 109 ‘penpusher’ executives and a £1 million customer satisfaction survey.

London mayor Sadiq Khan to spend £1.7m on water fountains instead of police.

Sadiq Khan to spend £6m on toilets for London bus drivers.

Sadiq Khan criticised over 60 per cent rise in staff costs at City Hall since taking office

A spokesman for Mr Khan said he “makes no apologies for his work”, despite the wage bill climbing from £3.8m in 2016 to £6m in 2018.

In anybody’s books that accounts for 800 million.

THERE YOU HAVE IT.

Elected on no policies, just the race card, the unions and people wanting to feel they were diverse.

These people have to look at the rape victims, the murdered kids, acid-scarred victims. Look into the faces of the families of murdered and raped people, those affected by violent crime.

Look at your depleted police force, look at your lack of social housing, your raised council tax, your closed police stations, your transport system now losing millions.

Look at the squandered millions that could have saved lives.

Was Khan worth the vote?

You want to talk about Social Justice?

It was the Social Justice Warriors who created this disaster.

Be proud, be very proud.